Late but Perhaps Clearer Notes on Structure WG Mtg, 10/19
Agenda Points Pertaining to Structure
+Facilitation
+Info
+Outreach
———————————
1. Brainstorming / setting agenda
- address how to keep meetings running smoothly
- what to do in the event that individuals become upset
- possibilities: have someone (possibly designated) to take that person aside and address their concerns without interrupting the meeting
- how to avoid the meeting “going in circles” / efficiency
- making sure people, even those who come halfway through the meeting, understand the process and feel included
- making sure people, ” ” , understand the roles of facilitators, etc
- defining the role of the structural working group
- transparency
- communications / outreach specifically for WSP
- consolidating twitter / FB accounts into a single WSP internet presence
- coordination with NYU’s GA, CUNY, etc
- set the agenda for tomorrow’s GA
john is designated as timekeeper
first agenda item: setting the role of the structural working group
- one role of structural WG to make sure each WG knows the responsibilities of its and each other WG
- address “things to remember” to keep GA running smoothly
- our group NOT empowered to establish structure of GA, but should analyze it and suggest conclusions to GA
- group can be strong, as long as it is transparent and open
- possibility of bringing a proposal to group regarding future GA structure
second AI: efficiency during GA
- codify meeting procedures
- announcements of group, of WGs, etc
- empower people to use hand signals more often
- someone designated to catch people up who come late
- debate of indoor / outdoor GAs
third AI: facilitation WG at zucotti
- clarifying / communicating with zucotti
- sending representatives from WSP WGs to respective zucotti WGs
- rep from WSP GA to zucotti GA
- WSP is part of OWS movement, but autonomous
- whether to wait or go ahead with contacting existing movements at zucotti
fourth AI: agenda for tomorrow’s GA (thurs 10/20)
- what was discussed by each WG
- which is a report back, not a debate
- discussion of GAs and (not how they have to be, but) how they have worked in the past
- proposal to let WGs establish themselves without being voted upon
- or announcement regarding structural WGs decision to let WGs establish themselves without being voted upon
- creation of a communications WG
- notice on what that would entail, twitter, FB, etc
- let people know that each issue can be contributed to by any member
- discussion of whether to get emails (to be discussed further by communications WG)
- breakout groups and report backs